Interpreting the Meaning of Private :: Definition Essays

Interpreting the Meaning of PrivateHearing the formulate private, one could deem of infinite meanings and uses. Some people think, for their own safety, certain people should not be private. Others believe it is their human right to have privacy, because it defines oneself. The dictionary-defined term of private has had pernicious changes through the past 300 years. In the past three years, the definition of private in the US has changed to very little meaning, granting an even more authorized reason to find the true definition.The pre-9/11 definitions never limit privacy to certain groups or people, and they never seem to grant more privacy to new(prenominal) people. In 1634, the OED defined private as not open to the public restricted for privileged persons. The focus of this definition is the exclusive rights to view or act with an object. As time passed, in 1913, the meaning grew to personal property (Websters). More property everyday became private, as people feared a lar ge giving medication arrogant their lives. A current definition includes seclusion from sight, presence or intrusion of others and focuses on a lack of knowledge of under privileged people (AHD, 2000).Lately, the government has been passing radical laws violating many peoples privacy rights. The USA PATRIOT ACT and the USA PATRIOT ACT II critically damage many of the definitions of private. Through the acts, people residing in the United States can have meetings tapped, their personal property searched without knowledge, and followed/harassed within the confines of their own home. To many people, the word private brings forth a view of secrecy or personal belongings. Bathrooms and locker rooms, attorneys and their clients, to name a couple, are hoped to be private by to the highest degree people. Privacy does not depend on the person, as privacy is a human right everyone should be granted. In Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael Moore shows a placidity group who had an undercover agent inf iltrate them, violating their privacy. The group was not criminals, and had not been found guilty of anything, yet big brother decided these peoples rights should be limited.With the passing of these laws, privacy is decreasing. People may wonder what would life be without privacy? No walls in the bathroom, shared locker rooms, records of who you talked to and about what, not to mention trying to build a legal defense if charged with a crime. How could one defend him/herself against an accusation if there could be no prep involved?